In his book, the Path is the Goal, Trungpa Rinpoche lays out some very good, think-out-of-the-box, points regarding meditation and mindfulness that resonated with this old Mystic and that I would like to share. Chögyam Trungpa (full name, Rinpoche is a word signifying reference to a teacher) was a Tibetan Buddhist monastic who eventually left the monastic life and taught in Europe and later in the United States. You can read about him here: Wiki. I titled this piece “Light from Trungpa Rinpoche,” perhaps in recognition that he was very bright, had deep spiritual insight, and presented Buddhist concepts in a way that appealed to western audiences. The book was based on a series of talks he gave in the early 70’s, before his later years of troubling behavior. May the positive endure. Note, his quotes are in italics.
“Meditation is a noun, not a verb.” It is just sitting. No “mediate” and no Meditator.” This sounds very similar to the basic Zen approach of sitting, with no gaining mind and non-thinking.
We talk about holding things lightly in Buddhism, although that would not seem obvious when observing participants during a Zen retreat. People often appear serious and solemn. Trungpa talks about a generic technique which could be applied to sitting or mindfulness (when not sitting.) So, the time is spent 25% paying attention, 25% relaxing, 25% friendship with self and 25% open to the possibility of something happening. This is interesting as long as one does not do active “accounting” during the process. It’s more or less an attitude and the Middle Way between extremes.
He mentions “awareness” as the end resultant, if you will, of meditation and mindfulness. “Awareness being egoless-ness because there is no object of awareness. You are aware of the whole thing completely, of you and the other and the activities of the you and the other at the same time. So, everything is open. There is no particular object of the awareness.” This is a nice description of the non-dual state. Awareness might also be the very fabric of Suchness. See further reference to Suchness (tathata in Pali) Here.
Trungpa on openness: “Each flower on earth has a personal relationship with the sun, although the sun does not particularly personally direct its attention with any bias, does not actually shine more on the rosebud than the poppy, or anything like that. The whole process depends on how much receptivity there is, how much openness.” This is similar to the parable of the Medicinal Plants in the Lotus Sutra where each plant gets just the right amount of rain and nutrients with the implication that each being is unique and has a certain capacity (in place and time) for teachings and propensity for “awakening.” Both the analogy by Trungpa and the parable seem to center on the individual. As a twist, while we could say that the “sun” is awareness or Suchness, masters such as the Buddha and, in general, transmitted Buddhist teachers, use skillful means to teach, recognizing the capacity and karmic stream of their audience.
On basic meditation — While this mystic has talked about various meditation techniques, Trungpa’s emphasis is to initially start a practice using “peaceful abiding meditation”, samatha, essentially mindful breathing. This would be followed or coupled, over time, with vipassana, or insight meditation. In Zen we sit in shikantaza, having no object (i.e. objectless meditation.) This might be the hardest and most advanced type of practice, whereas in breath-focused samatha, the object is the breath, which of course all live beings can work with. Sometimes it’s essential to pause and just breath; be the breath. Vipassana also has an object, which is examining things as they are. At the same time, this mystic’s take, vipassana is also like a sword cutting through delusion and seeing things as they are. My own experience with meditation and interacting with others in the meditation community is that most practitioners have a certain propensity toward a certain technique, based on their abilities/capacity personal characteristics and the point in time. He uses a tree analogy in that we start with the leaves and eventually find the roots. Putting shikantaza practice aside, there is always an element of insight or vipassana present in most “meditative” Buddhist traditions.
This mystic has found it interesting that when one sits in meditation there is no place to go but to fully face one’s internal state. Trungpa provides an analogy to the concept of people putting on a face (my words) when interacting in the world. That face is then what he calls our portable theatre stage. It’s full of our persona and always carries a unique “self” identity-history that then interacts with the external world. It’s like we “radiate” a self. He says, “in Vipashyana, you as a practitioner experience the game that you are playing in setting up your ‘theatre’… you experience your own radiation, face to face rather than playing with it to impress or overpower your audience. You have no audience when you sit and meditate, or you are your own audience.” So, when this old mystic faces a wall, his radiation is all his own. We face our thoughts, our conceived notion of self, and so much more. We learn from it.
Even if we practice as a community, the act of meditation is a very solitary one. He notes that it can be a lonely and boring journey, with both loneliness and boredom being capable of teaching us if we lean into it. Finally, encouragement is provided to seek a teacher, a spiritual friend. Unless one just sticks to simple breathing meditation (which is good!) eventually sitting facing a wall leads to many spiritual questions, thus a teacher. A spiritual friend can break the loneliness, if for a while.
What does Trungpa Rinpoche say about mindfulness practice? The longer this mystic meditates the more it seems that where the rubber hits the road is off the meditation cushion. Sure, we have our precepts and a plethora of teachings to study but those are only tools, whereas the Mindfulness (or mindfulness goal) that he talks about is in essence equivalent to being Fully Present. He calls mindfulness a samatha practice. To practice mindfulness, he explains, we have to take a vow to remember to be present – “recollection.” “Just being there, very simply, very directly, conducting yourself precisely and relating very thoroughly. The idea is to be precise and direct but without aim or goal [no gaining idea].” It’s not necessarily a concentration practice and bigger than just simply focusing on one object at a time.
He talks about developing a memory that you have taken a vow that you were going to be an aware person. You develop awareness throughout your life. “A living memory… because of that memory ‘absent-mindedness’ occurs, and from that ‘absent-mindedness’ mindfulness occurs.” So, what is he saying, really? It does not mean spacing out or lost in the chatter of our thoughts, fantasies or anxieties. That is negative absent mindedness. The kind he is alluding to is “No Mind.” In deep awareness there would be little ego or calculating self, literally no mind. Remember, earlier he was quoted saying “Awareness [is] egoless-ness because there is no object of awareness.” No object, then no subject. After all, do we really know who we are?
